A Wave of Violence in Religious Sanctuaries

In the wake of Bangladesh’s political upheaval in July–August 2024, a series of deadly attacks and mob killings have unfolded in and around mosques and other religious sites. These incidents began almost immediately after the resignation of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on August 5, 2024, when law enforcement largely withdrew and mobs seized the moment. According to eyewitness reports and community leaders, violent crowds targeted minority Muslim sects and other communities, often focusing their rage on places of worship. The following are some of the key incidents reported in the aftermath:

• August 5, 2024 – Ahmednagar, Panchagarh: An extremist mob attacked an Ahmadiyya Muslim mosque and the surrounding Ahmadi community, vandalizing the mosque and destroying around 80 homes . At least 22 Ahmadis were injured in the violence, one of them a 16-year-old boy who suffered critical head wounds . After three months of treatment, the boy, Shahriar Rakeen, succumbed to his injuries on November 8 . The Ahmadiyya community condemned the “barbaric communal attack” and demanded justice for what they termed a premeditated assault taking advantage of a post-government vacuum .

• August 5–6, 2024 – Rangpur, Rajshahi, Nilphamari, and Dhaka: In the chaos immediately following the government’s fall, coordinated attacks against Ahmadiyya Muslim sites erupted across multiple districts. On August 5, a mosque of the minority Ahmadi sect in Taraganj (Rangpur) was torched by a mob . The next day, August 6, mobs struck Ahmadiyya mosques in Bamnail village, Rajshahi, and in Choraikhola, Nilphamari . In Dhaka’s Madartek neighborhood, an Ahmadi mosque was assaulted twice in one day by local extremists . These attacks left property in ruins and community members wounded, though exact casualty figures beyond injuries were not immediately reported.

• August 6, 2024 – Sherpur: In Rangtia village of Sherpur district, a group of religious fanatics attacked and vandalized an Ahmadiyya mosque and several homes of Ahmadi residents . This assault, occurring the same day as the other August 6 incidents, underscored how widespread the violence was during that week.

• August 9, 2024 – Sherpur (Continued): Another mob attack against the Ahmadiyya community was orchestrated in Sherpur. Investigations revealed that a local Union Council chairman incited a crowd of religious extremists to carry out the August 9 attack . Community leaders pointed to such instances as evidence that local power brokers exploited the law enforcement vacuum for personal or political motives.

While these “mosque-related” incidents largely involved attacks on the minority Ahmadiyya Muslim community, they were part of a broader pattern of lawlessness. Islamist hard-liners also turned their fury toward other religious targets. For example, in the chaotic days following Hasina’s ouster, there was a string of attacks on Hindu temples and Muslim Sufi shrines by extremist mobs . In one case, arsonists tore open the roof of a 50-year-old Hindu temple in Dhour village outside Dhaka and set idols ablaze on December 7, 2024 . “We don’t feel safe,” said Swapna Ghosh, a devotee at the temple, after assailants nearly burned the sanctuary down . Even members of the Sunni majority were not spared from vigilante violence: at Bangladesh’s oldest university in Dhaka, a mentally ill man wandering a dormitory was lynched by a mob of students in September 2024 on mere suspicion of theft . By all accounts, these episodes illustrate a dangerous collapse of order – from sacred spaces to educational institutions – in the latter half of 2024.

Government Responses and Actions Taken

The interim government that took charge in August 2024, led by Chief Adviser (and Nobel laureate) Dr. Muhammad Yunus, has acknowledged the breakdown of law and order and taken several steps – albeit with mixed results – to address the crisis. In public statements, Yunus appealed for calm and warned against vigilante justice. “Do not take the law into your own hands,” he urged citizens in a nationally televised speech in mid-September, after weeks of mob violence . Earlier, several student protest leaders had also spoken out against mob lynching, but these appeals initially did little to stem the tide .

Faced with spiraling chaos, the interim authorities moved to bolster security measures. The government deployed the military alongside police, granting army units sweeping law enforcement powers to restore order in mid-September . This was an extraordinary measure, essentially authorizing soldiers to act as magistrates in quelling unrest. “It has been done to maintain law and order in view of the overall situation,” explained Asif Nazarul, the interim government’s law adviser, describing the move as temporary . Checkpoints were established in some areas and joint police-Border Guard patrols intensified, particularly in districts hit by communal attacks. The Home Affairs Adviser, Jahangir Alam Chowdhury, announced the formation of a high-level committee to investigate the post-resignation violence, signaling that the state would probe major incidents like the attacks on minorities .

Security forces did intervene in certain cases. In Dhaka, for instance, police later arrested and charged six students over the lynching at Dhaka University, with investigations implicating seven more suspects in a related campus killing . And in areas like Panchagarh and Rangpur, paramilitary troops were dispatched to deter further mob attacks on vulnerable villages. Police spokesmen have repeatedly urged the public to seek help from law enforcement rather than resort to mob rule. “We urge citizens to seek help from the police, instead of taking the law into their own hands,” said Inamul Haque Sagar, a Dhaka Metropolitan Police spokesman, emphasizing that vigilantes would be prosecuted .

Despite these efforts, critics say the response has been slow and uneven. During the height of the August unrest, many police officers abandoned their posts, “vanished from the streets, creating a vacuum” in security . This security vacuum allowed mobs to act with impunity for critical days. The caretaker government has since promised to increase protection for minorities – it even publicly expressed “shock” when foreign officials suggested international peacekeepers might be needed, insisting that Bangladesh can handle the situation internally . Officials have also pushed back against what they call misinformation: the influential Islamist group Hefazat-e-Islam staged protests accusing neighboring India of running a propaganda campaign about minority persecution, an allegation Dhaka and New Delhi have disputed .

By late 2024, the interim administration claimed the violence was subsiding and that normalcy was returning. However, observers note that these assurances ring hollow to those on the ground. Few perpetrators of the mosque attacks and lynchings have been brought to justice so far, and no significant reparations or support have reached victims’ families. The government’s seriousness in tackling the issue will ultimately be judged by its follow-through – whether it can translate committees and speeches into real accountability and protection.

Public and Community Reactions

The surge in mob violence has stirred fear and outrage among Bangladesh’s public, especially within targeted communities. Religious minorities – Ahmadis, Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, and others – have been gripped by anxiety since August, with many questioning whether the authorities can keep them safe. “Neither I, my forefathers nor the villagers… have ever witnessed such communal attacks,” said Ratan Kumar Ghosh, a Hindu temple custodian outside Dhaka, describing the unprecedented nature of the post-revolution assaults . His temple was among those vandalized in the unrest, leaving charred deities and a traumatized congregation. “These incidents break harmony and trust,” Ghosh lamented, reflecting a broader sentiment that decades of neighborly coexistence are now under strain .

Across Bangladesh, minority groups have held demonstrations and press conferences to demand government protection. The Bangladesh Hindu-Buddhist-Christian Unity Council reported violent attacks against minority homes, businesses and worship sites in at least 29 districts in the immediate aftermath of the regime change . In Dhaka and Chattogram, minority rights organizations rallied, carrying placards pleading for peace and chanting for justice . “We want to live without fear,” one protest organizer declared, highlighting that many minority families were considering fleeing their towns if the situation did not improve. These public appeals apparently prompted Yunus’s direct outreach: on August 13, the Chief Adviser met with Hindu community representatives and vowed to uphold their rights and security .

Mainstream civil society and religious leaders have also condemned the violence. Notably, coordinators of the very student movement that led the pro-democracy uprising spoke out against the lynch mobs, stressing that vigilantism betrays the ideals of their “revolution” . Islamic scholars and imams in some communities used Friday sermons to urge peace, reminding worshippers that mob murder is antithetical to Islam. These voices of conscience, combined with graphic videos of beatings circulating on social media, have led to public soul-searching. For many Bangladeshis, the images of corpses dragged from mosques or suspects beaten to death in broad daylight have been deeply jarring. There is a sense of collective shame and anger that the country’s social fabric has frayed to this extent.

At the same time, segments of the public have tacitly supported or participated in the violence, driven by political vendettas or extremist fervor. In some locales, crowds cheered attacks on ruling-party officials and their perceived supporters. For example, Haradhan Roy, a Hindu councilor affiliated with Hasina’s Awami League, was lynched alongside his nephew in Rangpur, allegedly by opposition agitators . Videos on social media showed mobs even mocking victims’ religious identity – a chilling indicator of how dehumanized the targets have become in the eyes of some attackers . This polarization complicates the public reaction: while many Bangladeshis are horrified and demand justice, others have been swept up in the frenzy. Community elders and human rights activists are now working to rebuild trust at the grassroots level, organizing interfaith peace dialogues and neighborhood watch groups in hopes of preventing the next tragedy.

Law and Order in Question: Expert Perspectives

Security experts, human rights observers, and academics overwhelmingly agree that the mosque-related killings and wider mob violence signal a profound law-and-order crisis in Bangladesh. Abu Ahmed Faijul Kabir, a senior member of the rights group Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK), notes that the explosion of lynchings “reflect[s] the growing intolerance and radicalism in society.” Kabir and other activists caution that extremist narratives – left unchecked during the political transition – have emboldened fanatics to take matters into their own hands. The data compiled by ASK is telling: they recorded at least 128 people killed by mobs in 2024, with about 75% of those killings occurring after August 5 . Two other human rights organizations tallied even higher numbers (146 and 173 mob-killing deaths in 2024) – roughly three times more than the annual average in the preceding five years . To Dr. Meghna Guhathakurta, a Dhaka-based political analyst, such figures underscore a collapse of institutional authority: “When the state’s monopoly on force breaks down, factions within society impose their own ‘justice’”, she told a local news outlet, calling the current situation unparalleled in recent memory.

One root cause identified by experts is the security vacuum immediately after the government’s ouster. Former police officials point out that when Hasina’s regime fell, demoralized law enforcement ranks retreated. “After the widespread attacks on the police, law enforcement is now less active,” observes Syed Bazlul Karim, former chief of Detective Branch in Dhaka . During the revolution, protesters had ransacked police stations and even lynched a few officers (several were killed and hanged from overpasses in revenge) . That backlash left many officers unwilling to confront mobs in the days that followed. Bazlul Karim warns that criminal elements and extremists quickly moved to “do whatever they pleased” amid the paralysis, exploiting the chaos to settle scores . He supports the interim government’s decision to deploy the army and urges “strict action against those involved in mob justice” to re-establish deterrence . In his view, a strong show of force is needed to signal that anarchy will not be tolerated.

Not all experts are comfortable with heavy-handed solutions, however. Human rights advocates worry that empowering the military to curb civilian unrest sets a dangerous precedent. Patricia Gossman, associate Asia director at Human Rights Watch, notes that the same security forces now asked to restore order have long records of abuse under previous governments. Giving the army “unchecked” powers raises concerns about abuse, one rights researcher, Shayna Bleckner, told the press, adding: “We are under a new government that has made important commitments to human rights, but these are the same security forces that have carried out abuses for decades.” Balancing urgent security needs with respect for civil liberties is a key challenge, they argue. For instance, the interim government granted soldiers the authority to conduct summary trials of rioters, a move that some legal experts in Bangladesh criticized as unconstitutional overreach .

Sociologists further warn of a cascading effect on society if mob violence isn’t halted immediately. “In the next four or five months, I expect more chaos in various sectors because now anyone who can is trying to take matters into their own hands,” says Prof. Nehal Karim, a sociology professor at the University of Dhaka . He describes a breakdown of social norms: people have seen that protests and brute force can change laws or remove leaders, and “so everyone wants to take matters into their own hands” . From university campuses to rural villages, Professor Karim notes, authority figures – be it police officers, administrators, or teachers – have been attacked or humiliated by groups who feel empowered by the revolutionary success . “It must be stopped immediately, or else barbarity will increase,” he warns bluntly . This sentiment is echoed by community leaders who see vigilante killings as a direct threat to Bangladesh’s social cohesion. Badiul Alam Majumdar, editor of the civic platform Citizens for Good Governance,says security remains a “big challenge” for the interim authorities, but expresses cautious optimism: “It has been done temporarily. I hope the position will change,” he told VOA regarding the army deployment, implying that the rule of law must ultimately be returned to civilian hands .

The law-and-order implications extend to Bangladesh’s economic and political future as well. Business groups fear that sustained unrest could destabilize industrial areas – a police crackdown in late 2024 had to be ordered to protect factories amid worker riots . International observers are keeping a close eye, given that Bangladesh plans to hold new elections after reforms. As one security analyst aptly put it, “The interim government has a responsibility to maintain law and order, [but] giving the army ‘carte blanche’ is a double-edged sword.” The consensus among experts is that Bangladesh stands at a crossroads: either swiftly reinstate credible law enforcement and justice, or risk a slide into further lawlessness and sectarian strife.

Comparisons to Past Incidents and Regional Trends

While the current scale of vigilante violence in Bangladesh is alarming, it did not arise in a vacuum. The country has a long and troubled history of mob violence and communal attacks, especially during times of political turmoil. Rights records show that virtually every year in the past decade saw some level of religiously motivated violence, often targeting minorities . For example, in early 2023, Islamist mobs attacked an Ahmadiyya annual convention in the same village of Ahmednagar, Panchagarh that would be assaulted again in 2024 – that earlier incident left one Ahmadi dead and over 100 injured, with more than 200 homes burned . Looking further back, in 2014, at least 247 Hindu temples were attacked in election-related unrest, leaving one person dead and hundreds injured, and in 2016 communal clashes resulted in seven people killed . Large-scale anti-Hindu pogroms erupted in October 2021 during the Durga Puja festival, when rumors of a Quran desecration sparked riots across multiple districts; independent investigations later suggested political actors had orchestrated those riots for gain . Each of these episodes foreshadowed the pattern seen in 2024: fringe elements inciting ordinary people to violence, often with impunity.

What sets the post-Hasina “Monsoon Revolution” period apart is the sheer volume and rapidity of attacks. Ain o Salish Kendra documented 63 separate communal incidents in August 2024 alone, including at least two fatalities, marking a sharp spike compared to prior years . From January through November 2024, ASK recorded 118 incidents of anti-Hindu violence (not even counting attacks on Ahmadis and others), a figure far higher than the 22 attacks documented in the whole of 2023 . However, some observers note that Bangladesh has witnessed comparable or worse flashes of mob brutality in the past when governance broke down – for instance, the political transitions in 1990 and 2001 also saw revenge killings and communal riots . The difference now is that news of each incident in 2024 spread instantly on social media, potentially fueling copycat actions in a way that was not possible in earlier decades.

Regionally, Bangladesh’s challenges are not unique. South Asia has periodically been rocked by mob violence and sectarian strife. Neighboring Pakistan, for example, has seen frequent deadly attacks on minority Ahmadis and others; at least five Ahmadis were reportedly murdered in religiously motivated killings in Pakistan in 2024 . In India, lynch mobs have targeted individuals over rumors (from cattle slaughter to child kidnapping) with disturbing regularity in recent years, prompting India’s Supreme Court to call for new anti-lynching laws. Sri Lanka and Myanmar have likewise experienced mob attacks on Muslim minorities during times of political instability. These regional parallels highlight how volatile the mix of religious tension, political grievance, and weak rule of law can be. Analysts caution that Bangladesh must learn from these examples – both its own past and its neighbors – to break the cycle of violence. As academic Sukomal Barua notes, communal harmony in a multi-faith nation is fragile: “To establish a peaceful country where all faiths coexist in harmony, the head of state must engage regularly with faith leaders to foster understanding” . In other words, the solution lies not only in policing but also in proactive reconciliation and confidence-building among communities.

Recommendations and the Way Forward

In light of the ongoing crisis, experts and human rights organizations are pressing for a comprehensive strategy to address the mob violence and prevent future mosque-related killings. The consensus is that swift and serious action by the government is paramount – anything less could embolden perpetrators and further erode public trust. Key recommendations include:

• Ensure Accountability and Justice: A culture of impunity has fueled these vigilante attacks, so the authorities must vigorously investigate and prosecute the offenders. Amnesty International urged Bangladesh’s interim government to conduct prompt, impartial investigations into all crimes against religious minorities and incidents of mob violence, and to prosecute those responsible in fair trials . This means not only arresting the low-level rioters caught on video, but also pursuing the instigators and power figures (such as the local chairman who incited an attack in Sherpur ). Visible justice – through courts, not street retribution – will send a message that the rule of law still applies. The new high-level investigative committee should publicly report its findings and lead to charges against any organizers of coordinated attacks.

• Rebuild Law Enforcement Capacity: The government needs to restore public confidence in law enforcement. This involves reactivating the local police presence in affected areas, retraining officers if necessary, and providing them the resources to respond rapidly to mob incidents. Experts suggest deploying dedicated protection to vulnerable sites – for instance, posting security forces at Ahmadiyya mosques, Sufi shrines, and minority temples that could be targets, at least until tensions cool. While the army’s assistance was a stopgap, policing should return to civilian control as soon as feasible. “The interim government must come up with a plan to return policing powers to civilian authorities who will fairly protect and serve all Bangladeshis, regardless of race or creed,” says Kelsey Deibert, a regional researcher, emphasizing that soldiers should not become a long-term substitute for accountable policing . In practical terms, this may mean recruiting and deploying additional police in districts that saw the worst violence, and instituting community policing programs to improve relations between officers and residents.

• Protect Vulnerable Communities: Authorities should work closely with community leaders to safeguard those most at risk. This could involve setting up hotlines or rapid alert systems for minority neighborhoods to call in security forces at the first hint of trouble. Relief and rehabilitation for victims is also critical – families who lost homes, businesses or loved ones in the violence need support and reassurance that the state stands with them. Rights activists have called for compensation and rebuilding assistance for communities like Ahmednagar that were devastated by mobs . By visibly helping these victims rebuild, the government can counter the narrative that minorities are second-class citizens or political pawns.

• Public Awareness and Zero Tolerance for Hate: The interim government and civil society should launch a concerted public education campaign against mob justice. Religious and educational institutions can be platforms for this message. Imams, priests and monks should be encouraged to preach tolerance and patience in their sermons. Local radio, television, and social media can run messages debunking the rumors that often spark mob attacks. For example, past lynchings in Bangladesh were sometimes triggered by false WhatsApp rumors of “child kidnappers” or blasphemy – the authorities must counter such misinformation quickly. Dr. Muhammad Yunus’s public appeals were a start , but they need to be amplified nationwide. The government should also make it unequivocally clear that any form of communal hate speech or incitement to violence will be punished under the law.

• Legal and Policy Reforms: In the longer term, experts advocate for legal reforms to address the phenomenon of mob violence. This could include passing specific anti-lynching legislation that defines mob killings as a distinct criminal offense with strict penalties. Judiciary processes could be fast-tracked for these cases to ensure timely justice. Additionally, security sector reforms – as outlined in a recent Human Rights Watch report – are needed to professionalize the police and make them more accountable to citizen rights . Strengthening institutions like the National Human Rights Commission, and empowering them to monitor communal violence, would help in the early identification and prevention of such incidents.

• Dialogue and Reconciliation: Finally, many observers underscore the importance of healing the divisions that have led to this crisis. The interim leadership, perhaps in partnership with NGOs or the United Nations, could facilitate dialogues between community representatives. For instance, bringing together Islamic scholars, minority religious leaders, and student movement figures for joint statements promoting peace could reduce mistrust at the grassroots. As Professor Sukomal Barua suggested, regular engagement with faith leaders could foster mutual understanding and quell the poisonous “us vs. them” mentality behind much of the violence . Grassroots peace committees might be formed in mixed-population villages to address grievances before they explode. The goal must be to rebuild the social harmony that Ratan Ghosh and others recall – where neighbors saw each other as fellow Bangladeshis, not as targets for revenge.

Conclusion

The post-July 2024 surge of mosque-related killings and mob attacks has been a sobering test for Bangladesh’s commitment to law and order. What began as a hopeful student-led movement for democratic change was marred by an eruption of vigilantism, exposing deep fault lines of communal tension and public frustration with justice. The incidents detailed – from Ahmadnagar’s torched mosque to the lynchings on university grounds – paint a picture of a nation teetering between anarchy and the rule of law. The government’s response, though gradually improving, has yet to convince citizens that it fully grasps the urgency of the crisis. Each new attack or killing is not just a tragic loss of life but also a blow to Bangladesh’s pluralistic social fabric and international reputation.

If there is a silver lining, it is the widespread recognition that this trajectory must not continue. Voices from all corners – victims’ families, civil society, religious leaders, and international observers – are calling on the government to treat the situation with the gravity it deserves. This means moving beyond rhetoric and taking decisive action to prevent further bloodshed. Bangladesh has overcome turmoil before, and it can do so again, but only if the authorities reassert control in a just manner and the public recommits to the principles of tolerance and the rule of law. The recent violence is a stark warning of what can happen when those principles are cast aside. To honor those who lost their lives in these mosque-related killings, the state must ensure that such atrocities are never repeated. The time to act is now – to restore order, to deliver justice, and to show that Bangladesh will not allow mob rule to replace the rule of law. The cost of inaction or half measures will be measured in more innocent lives and a further unraveling of the country’s hard-won social harmony – a price Bangladesh cannot afford.

Sources:

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR