Skip to content

Bangladesh

High Court issues rule asking why ACC briefings about Asif Mahmud should not be declared illegal

The rule also asks why the ACC should not be restrained from briefings on matters under inquiry or investigation. Asif Mahmud filed the writ in September.

5 newspapers

Published 11 November 2026, 14:15

High Court issues rule asking why ACC briefings about Asif Mahmud should not be declared illegal

The High Court issued a rule asking why the ACC's press briefings about Asif Mahmud should not be declared illegal, according to reports in Prothom Alo, The Daily Star, The Business Standard, Jagonews24 and Jugantor. The bench of Justice Md Bashir Ullah and Justice Md Hamidur Rahman issued the rule on Wednesday, 11 November, as Prothom Alo, The Daily Star and The Business Standard noted.

Asif Mahmud filed a writ petition in September challenging the legality of the ACC briefings, according to Prothom Alo, The Daily Star and The Business Standard.

According to Prothom Alo, the ACC's deputy director and assistant director gave two press briefings on 2 and 13 September.

Prothom Alo and The Business Standard reported that, after deciding to start an inquiry into corruption and money laundering allegations, the briefings said 'preliminary truth was found'.

Prothom Alo reported that the rule asks why the briefings should not be declared without legal authority for violating Article 31 of the Constitution and the 2011 information disclosure policy.

Prothom Alo and The Business Standard wrote that the rule also asks why the ACC should not be restrained from press briefings on matters under ongoing inquiry or investigation.

The Business Standard reported that the High Court also asked why dissemination of such statements by the media should not be declared illegal.

Prothom Alo reported that the ACC chairman, the deputy director and PR officer, and the assistant director were asked to respond to the rule. According to Prothom Alo and The Daily Star, the time to respond is 4.

Prothom Alo and The Business Standard said hearings on the writ concluded on 4 November, with 11 November fixed for the order. The petitioner's lawyers included Mohammad Hossain, Yusuf Ali and Zahirul Islam Musa, while Mohammad Mahbubur Rahman Khan represented the ACC.

What each paper says

  • Prothom Alo

    আসিফ মাহমুদকে নিয়ে দুদকের প্রেস ব্রিফিং কেন বেআইনি নয়

    • Time to respond to the rule 4
    • The bench comprised Justice Md Bashir Ullah and Justice Md Hamidur Rahman.
    • Asif Mahmud filed the writ petition challenging the legality of the ACC briefings, in September.
    Read the original →
  • The Daily Star

    HC asks why ACC briefings on Asif Mahmud should not be declared illegal

    • Time to respond to the rule 4
    • The bench comprised Justice Md Bashir Ullah and Justice Md Hamidur Rahman.
    • Asif Mahmud filed the writ petition challenging the legality of the ACC briefings, in September.
    Read the original →
  • TBS

    HC questions legality of ACC's 'preliminary evidence' claims after Asif Mahmud's writ

    • The bench comprised Justice Md Bashir Ullah and Justice Md Hamidur Rahman.
    • Asif Mahmud filed the writ petition challenging the legality of the ACC briefings, in September.
    • The briefings said 'preliminary truth was found' after deciding to start an inquiry into corruption and money laundering allegations.
    Read the original →
  • Jagonews24

    আসিফ মাহমুদের বিরুদ্ধে দুদকের সংবাদ সম্মেলন কেন বেআইনি নয়: হাইকোর্ট

      Read the original →
    • Jugantor

      আসিফ মাহমুদের বিরুদ্ধে দুদকের সংবাদ সম্মেলনের বৈধতা নিয়ে হাইকোর্টের রুল

        Read the original →

      Checked

      The same fact in every newspaper

      • ✓ The High Court issued a rule asking why the ACC's press briefings about Asif Mahmud should not be declared illegal.
      • ✓ Asif Mahmud Shojib Bhuiyan (former adviser, NCP leader), the ACC, and the High Court bench of Justice Md Bashir Ullah and Justice Md Hamidur Rahman.
      • ✓ 11 November 2026 (Wednesday)

      One source only

      • Prothom Alo—The rule asks why the briefings should not be declared without legal authority for violating Article 31 of the Constitution and the 2011 information disclosure policy.
      • TBS—The High Court also asked why dissemination of such statements by the media should not be declared illegal.
      • Prothom Alo—The ACC chairman, deputy director/PR officer and assistant director were asked to respond to the rule.

      Agreed by several outlets means at least 3 newspapers wrote the same fact, and they are the majority. Agreement is not an independent check.

      How this comparison is madeCorrections policy

      Sources

      Was this comparison useful?

      Spot a mistake? Tell us

      Method

      AI comparison — generated automatically from the linked sources

      Tell us about an error in a published story. Message: 10 to 1000 characters.