Stayed suspension beneficial for Taft Stettinius spouse who allegedly had intercourse with Jstomer
Symbol from Shutterstock.
A spouse at Taft Stettinius & Hollister’s Columbus, Ohio, place of job, must obtain a stayed suspension for allegedly having intercourse with a consumer, in step with a advice by way of the Ohio Ultimate Courtroom’s Board of Skilled Behavior.
The spouse, Jessica Mager, had agreed to the self-discipline, record Reuters and the Felony Career Weblog, which hyperlinks to the Feb. 4 advice. The board beneficial a six-month suspension, stayed at the situation that Mager chorus from additional misconduct.
Mager was once representing the shopper in a divorce when she allegedly had intercourse with him at her house in October 2019. Two days later, the shopper were given right into a verbal and bodily altercation together with his spouse, in step with factual allegations cited by way of the pro habits board.
The buyer was once discovered useless at his house later that day. His demise was once decided to be a suicide.
Mager stipulated to violation of a habits rule that bars sexual process with a consumer until a consensual dating existed when the client-lawyer dating started.
The board famous that Mager had no prior self-discipline, the misconduct concerned a unmarried Jstomer, and he or she displayed a cooperative angle within the complaints. A number of judges, legal professionals and previous purchasers additionally submitted letters testifying to her excellent persona.
Mager informed Reuters in September, when disciplinary fees had been filed, that she had “earned a name for integrity” in twenty years of training regulation.
“Then again, two years in the past, all through a troublesome time in my lifestyles, I made a major error in judgment,” she mentioned. “I haven’t any one guilty however myself, and I settle for complete accountability for my movements.”
Mager’s attorney, Jonathan Coughlan of the Coughlan Legislation Company, despatched an up to date observation to the ABA Magazine.
“There was no determination,” Coughlan mentioned. “That is merely a joint advice to the Ultimate Courtroom of Ohio, which makes the verdict. If truth be told, the joint advice took place a while in the past.”
Up to date at 7 p.m. to incorporate Coughlan’s observation.